<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?><!-- generator=Zoho Sites --><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><atom:link href="https://www.cohereconsulting.com/blogs/uncategorized/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><title>Cohere Consulting - Perspectives , Uncategorized</title><description>Cohere Consulting - Perspectives , Uncategorized</description><link>https://www.cohereconsulting.com/blogs/uncategorized</link><lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2026 11:42:23 -0800</lastBuildDate><generator>http://zoho.com/sites/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[The Purpose of Purpose for Teams ]]></title><link>https://www.cohereconsulting.com/blogs/post/idea-identity1</link><description><![CDATA[A collective purpose is considered as the holy grail for teams. It provides direction, meaning and a reason to act. A well-crafted purpose can synchro ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="zpcontent-container blogpost-container "><div data-element-id="elm_CKVMGVvzT9Cs_16wUjGf9Q" data-element-type="section" class="zpsection "><style type="text/css"></style><div class="zpcontainer-fluid zpcontainer"><div data-element-id="elm_LdBt9R0pQL2ipjcRcLEMhg" data-element-type="row" class="zprow zprow-container zpalign-items- zpjustify-content- " data-equal-column=""><style type="text/css"></style><div data-element-id="elm_fiCibcF6S3e9jGW4cAXhsQ" data-element-type="column" class="zpelem-col zpcol-12 zpcol-md-12 zpcol-sm-12 zpalign-self- "><style type="text/css"></style><div data-element-id="elm_YPtkg30OSpGvfvhrqGMK4A" data-element-type="heading" class="zpelement zpelem-heading "><style></style><h2
 class="zpheading zpheading-align-center zpheading-align-mobile-center zpheading-align-tablet-center " data-editor="true"><span><b><span>Moving from Alignment to Emergence</span></b></span></h2></div>
<div data-element-id="elm_qsMq8ukLS_u6ZClfPx5HoQ" data-element-type="text" class="zpelement zpelem-text "><style></style><div class="zptext zptext-align-center zptext-align-mobile-center zptext-align-tablet-center " data-editor="true"><p style="text-align:left;"></p><div><p style="text-align:left;"><span>A collective purpose is considered as the holy grail for teams. It provides direction, meaning and a reason to act. A well-crafted purpose can synchronise efforts and bring coherence to a team’s performance. Yet, the very purpose that defines a team, over time, could limit its potential and become less of an enabler and more of a boundary, if held tightly. &nbsp;</span></p><p style="text-align:left;"><span><br/></span></p><p style="text-align:left;"><span>This article explores </span>how teams can reimagine their purpose not as a static statement but as something evolving and responding to changes by being open, flexible and curious about future possibilities. </p><p style="text-align:left;"><b><span><br/></span></b></p><p style="text-align:left;"><b><span>When Purpose Helps and Hinders</span></b></p><p style="text-align:left;"><b><span><br/></span></b></p><p style="text-align:left;"><span>For an organisation, a clearly defined and articulated purpose answers the ‘why’ of its existence. When cascaded well, it can offer meaning to the teams and guidance to the individuals. For a team, when its purpose aligns with that of its organisation but remains distinct enough to define its uniqueness, it can energise the team’s morale and actions to become a powerful force. </span></p><p style="text-align:left;"><span><br/></span></p><p style="text-align:left;"><span>In our team coaching experience, we have witnessed that when there is a high degree of coherence of purpose among the team members, it invariably shows in the performance. The coherent teams go beyond their goals, and their members collaborate to solve problems and support each other when needed, all qualities of high-performance teams. </span></p><p style="text-align:left;"><span><br/></span></p><p style="text-align:left;"><span>However, a team’s purpose must be viewed in the context of today’s challenging and volatile business landscape. Geopolitical</span> uncertainty, technological disruptions like AI, rapidly shifting markets, and increasing environmental expectations impact the strategies and actions of businesses &nbsp;<span>Teams, as microcosms of the organisations, also need to navigate such complexities. </span></p><p style="text-align:left;"><span><br/></span></p><p style="text-align:left;"><span>In such contexts, when purpose becomes rigid, teams stop </span>sensing, innovating and adapting<span>. They may begin to prefer predictability over curiosity, certainty over possibility and continuity over creativity.&nbsp; That brings up the question; is well-defined and shared purpose enough for a team to excel consistently in today’s dynamic and unpredictable world?&nbsp; </span></p><p style="text-align:left;"><span><br/></span></p><p style="text-align:left;"><b><span>Redefining the Purpose of Purpose </span></b></p><p style="text-align:left;"><b><span><br/></span></b></p><p style="text-align:left;"><span>A fundamental outcome of a purpose is <i>alignment</i>. It means the members know their roles, understand priorities, minimise friction and move in the same direction. &nbsp;</span>It transforms a group of individuals into a cohesive force<span>. </span>&nbsp;<span>But there is a paradox; the stronger the alignment, the higher the risk of teams focussing to what is already known and becoming too dependent on the past to solve future problems. In such cases, is valuable but not sufficient. </span>This is where teams need to reimagine their purpose to be future safe. </p><p style="text-align:left;"><br/></p><p style="text-align:left;"><span>Teams need the ability to redefine their purpose following an approach that can help them evolve, innovate, adopt and respond to rapid changes. This is where <i>emergence</i> becomes essential. <i>&nbsp;</i>Emergence allows new possibilities to surface – ideas, opportunities, collaboration and ways of working. &nbsp;It requires teams to loosen their attachment to current purpose, </span>move from the known, and explore uncharted territory. <span>Emergence cannot be planned; it is discovered in the journey. </span></p><p style="text-align:left;"><span><br/></span></p><p style="text-align:left;"><span>Teams </span>can take practical steps to move from fixed purpose to emergent purpose. Here are four considerations.</p><p style="text-align:left;"><br/></p><p style="text-align:left;"><b><i><span>Bring Broader Perspectives</span></i></b></p><p style="text-align:left;"><span>Teams that hold purpose tightly may unconsciously close out ideas and fresh perspectives that appear misaligned with their purpose and thus narrowing their potential. To allow emergence to happen, teams should be open to a wider range of perspectives; they should engage regularly with diverse stakeholders, periodically invite external experts, &nbsp;learn from peer teams and adopt business frameworks that broaden their field of vision. Fresh and alternate perspectives provide the inspiration needed for a more dynamic purpose. </span></p><p style="text-align:left;"><span><br/></span></p><p style="text-align:left;"><b><i><span>Treat Purpose as Hypothesis</span></i></b></p><p style="text-align:left;"><span>Teams tend to treat purpose as a fixed statement that needs to be adhered to at all circumstances. Instead, teams could treat the purpose as a hypothesis, a work-in-progress statement. A hypothesis invites inquiry and testing; challenging the assumptions made in the purpose, assessing changes around and inviting new evidence that could prompt a revision.</span></p><p style="text-align:left;"><span><br/></span></p><p style="text-align:left;"><b><i><span>Focus on Presence</span></i></b></p><p style="text-align:left;"><span>During team coaching, we often see teams defaulting to analysing, planning or deciding during the coaching sessions. Emergence requires a state of presence, the ability to pause, sense and reflect on what is unfolding in real time. In such an&nbsp; ‘awareness’ mode they can observe their own bias and blind spots and, in the process, uncover hidden opportunities and possibilities they had not considered before. </span>Presence shifts the team from reacting to realising<i>.</i></p><p style="text-align:left;"><i><br/></i></p><p style="text-align:left;"><b><i><span>Purpose as “Leading from Emerging Future”</span></i></b></p><p style="text-align:left;"><span>Professor Otto Scharmer, known for his ‘Theory U’, &nbsp;describes two sources of learning; (1) learning from the past and (2) learning from sensing emerging future possibilities. Most complex challenges of today cannot be solved by applying past methods. Purpose, therefore, &nbsp;must help the teams break the patterns of the past, sense what is unfolding and create new patterns. </span>This requires vulnerability, courage and trust among the members to let go of old ideas and shape the emerging landscape.</p><p style="text-align:left;"><br/></p><p style="text-align:left;"><b><span>Conclusion</span></b></p><p style="text-align:left;"><b><span><br/></span></b></p><p style="text-align:left;"><span>Pivoting away from a fixed purpose can be unnerving for teams. It can confront their long-held beliefs, past decisions and deeply valued identity. </span>I<span>n a world marked by uncertainty and change the goal is not to discard the purpose but allow it to evolve. </span>Team coaching can support this transition, offering a space to reflect, bring in perspectives and help teams move from alignment to emergence. Teams that revisit their purpose with openness, question their assumptions, listen to diverse perspectives, stay present, and sense the future become capable of reinventing themselves and flourishing in emergence.&nbsp;</p></div><p></p></div>
</div><div data-element-id="elm_GZYTR599SzSfnJVlBpsC_Q" data-element-type="button" class="zpelement zpelem-button "><style></style><div class="zpbutton-container zpbutton-align-center zpbutton-align-mobile-center zpbutton-align-tablet-center"><style type="text/css"></style><a class="zpbutton-wrapper zpbutton zpbutton-type-primary zpbutton-size-md " href="javascript:;" target="_blank"><span class="zpbutton-content">Get Started Now</span></a></div>
</div></div></div></div></div></div> ]]></content:encoded><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 06:52:13 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Idea =Identity ]]></title><link>https://www.cohereconsulting.com/blogs/post/idea-identity</link><description><![CDATA[“He would hold on to an idea, try to make it work somehow, even if all forms of evidence point to the impracticality of the idea.” This was part of the ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="zpcontent-container blogpost-container "><div data-element-id="elm__zgdOVdaROSwgeaql1vBag" data-element-type="section" class="zpsection "><style type="text/css"></style><div class="zpcontainer-fluid zpcontainer"><div data-element-id="elm_81BioII7Sz6BWmWd03Tt_A" data-element-type="row" class="zprow zprow-container zpalign-items- zpjustify-content- " data-equal-column=""><style type="text/css"></style><div data-element-id="elm_O6MUeiEWT2myEWvEVKMmng" data-element-type="column" class="zpelem-col zpcol-12 zpcol-md-12 zpcol-sm-12 zpalign-self- "><style type="text/css"></style><div data-element-id="elm_E2fFRo5WTlaFzgOswYYlvA" data-element-type="heading" class="zpelement zpelem-heading "><style></style><h2
 class="zpheading zpheading-align-center zpheading-align-mobile-center zpheading-align-tablet-center " data-editor="true"><span><span>A Trap Leaders Often Walk Into</span></span><br/></h2></div>
<div data-element-id="elm_ZUkGysELSvaf3jDEyolOKg" data-element-type="text" class="zpelement zpelem-text "><style></style><div class="zptext zptext-align-left zptext-align-mobile-center zptext-align-tablet-center " data-editor="true"><p></p><div><p><i>“He would hold on to an idea, try to make it work somehow, even if all forms of evidence point to the impracticality of the idea.”</i></p><p><br/></p><p>This was part of the feedback shared by a sponsor about one of my coachees. In another instance, a patriarch of a family-run business I was consulting with refused to discontinue a loss-making product, which was close to his heart, despite mounting evidence and repeated pleas from his team.</p><p><br/></p><p>This pattern—of leaders becoming overly attached to their own ideas, even when they are no longer viable—is more common than we think. There seems to be a moment when conviction morphs into rigidity and idea becomes identity. And from that point on, letting go of an idea that may have well started as a bold or a thoughtful one, is not just a business decision—it becomes emotional, personal, even an existential threat.</p><p><br/></p><p><b>The Idea = Identity Trap</b></p><p><br/></p><p>Why do some leaders struggle to pivot, even in the face of obvious failures? A few underlying patterns can explain this behaviour:</p><p><b><i><br/></i></b></p><p><b><i>The Resolve–Flexibility Conflict: </i></b>In leadership stories, unwavering resolve is often a much-admired trait. Perseverance is placed top on the virtue pedestal. Flexibility, by contrast, is sometimes perceived as dilution or even weakness. When leaders equate flexibility with backing off, they miss the opportunity to correct. </p><p><br/></p><p><b><i>The Backfire Effect: </i></b>A close cousin of confirmation bias, this is the tendency to dismiss contrary evidence and double down on existing beliefs. The more challenged leaders feel, the more fiercely they cling to the original idea.</p><p><b><i><br/></i></b></p><p><b><i>Fear of Judgment: </i></b>Admitting that a decision was flawed can feel like exposing oneself—particularly in high-stakes, competitive, or hierarchical environments. The fear of losing credibility can override rational assessment.</p><p><b><i><br/></i></b></p><p><b><i>Hubris Mind: </i></b>Sometimes, ego and power play a larger role. The pursuit of recognition, status, or legacy can take precedence over the greater good. When leaders start to believe their ideas are inherently superior, dissent is easily dismissed.</p><p><b><i><br/></i></b></p><p><b><i>The Eternal Bond: </i></b>Some leaders fall in love with their ideas. The emotional investment is so high that separation feels like betrayal. Even when abandoning the idea outright is necessary, they may continue to support it subtly, through backdoor efforts.</p><p><b><br/></b></p><p><b>Lessons from the Real World</b></p><p><b><br/></b></p><p>There are numerous examples of this trap playing out in the real world. The story of Kingfisher Airlines, where personal passion overrode financial viability, or Tata Nano, which couldn’t find its market despite its noble intentions, comes to mind.</p><p>An extreme and cautionary tale is that of Theranos, once valued at USD 9 billion. Its founder, Elizabeth Holmes, promoted a revolutionary, minimally invasive blood-testing solution. The narrative was so compelling that few questioned the feasibility of the technology—until the truth came out that ended in her imprisonment. What started as an audacious idea became an illusion, propped up by greed and systemic silence.</p><p><b><br/></b></p><p><b>What is the Antidote?</b></p><p><br/></p><p>There is no single formula to prevent the <i>Idea = Identity</i> trap. But leaders can consciously cultivate habits that build awareness and bring changes. Here are some helpful approaches:</p><p><b><i><br/></i></b></p><p><b><i>Decoding Feedback</i>: </b>Actively process feedback from diverse sources. Rather than using it to confirm assumptions, treat it as a mirror. Dissenting voices, in particular, &nbsp;often hold the most valuable truths.</p><p><b><i><br/></i></b></p><p><b><i>Staying Grounded</i>: </b>Maintain clarity about what’s really happening. Leaders benefit from sizing up the environment openly and adapting accordingly. Being grounded is about seeing the world as it is—not as we want it to be.</p><p><b><i><br/></i></b></p><p><b><i>Being Reflective:</i></b>Take time to introspect: <i>Why am I holding on to this?</i> Is it about the idea itself, or what it represents—success, pride, fear of failure? Practices like journaling can help build alternate narratives and recover from personal beliefs.</p><p><b><i><br/></i></b></p><p><b><i>Building Psychological Distance</i>: </b>Changing the narrative from <i>“my idea”</i> to <i>“an idea I’m exploring”</i> can create just enough distance to evaluate it more objectively. The idea no longer defines the person—it simply becomes one of many alternatives considered.</p><p><b><i><br/></i></b></p><p><b><i>Normalising Course Correction:</i></b>Consider course correction as a strength. When teams see their leaders course-correct based on evidence and introspection, it builds trust, not doubt. Stepping back can be a sign of learning, not weakness.</p><p><b><br/></b></p><p><b>Closing Thought</b></p><p><br/></p><p>Ideas can be powerful. But when they become fused with ego, they can become dangerous. While resistance is natural, stubbornness can hinder progress and damage the cause. As coaches, we may also fall prey to this trap by engaging in a course of action even when we realise it is ineffective or not challenging leaders enough who are victims of this behaviour. For leaders, it may pay to remember that who they are is always bigger than what they have built—and that adaptability is not the opposite of strength, but it is quiet a companion.</p></div><p></p></div>
</div><div data-element-id="elm_jaweUM0YQlCr6jaI0XfyOA" data-element-type="button" class="zpelement zpelem-button "><style></style><div class="zpbutton-container zpbutton-align-center zpbutton-align-mobile-center zpbutton-align-tablet-center"><style type="text/css"></style><a class="zpbutton-wrapper zpbutton zpbutton-type-primary zpbutton-size-md " href="javascript:;" target="_blank"><span class="zpbutton-content">Get Started Now</span></a></div>
</div></div></div></div></div></div> ]]></content:encoded><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 06:51:30 +0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>